Site Map Search  
 
Current Issue

Clippings
Archive

Mar 2005
Dec 2004
Sept 2004
July 2004
Mar 2004
Jan 2004
Fall 2003
Summer 2003
Apr 2003
Feb/Mar 2002
Dec 2001
Nov 2001
Sep/Oct2001
Jul 2001
May 2001
Apr 2001
Mar 2001
Feb 2001
Jan 2001
Nov 2000
Oct 2000
Sept 2000
July/Aug 2000
June 2000
May 2000
Apr 2000
Mar 2000
Feb 2000
Dec 1999
Nov 1999
Oct 1999
Sept 1999
Jul/Aug 1999
June 1999
May 1999
March 1999
Feb 1999
Nov 1998
 
 March 1999
Published by NAMI North Carolina
North Carolina’s Voice on Mental Illness

Capital Ideas

Coalition 2001 Hosts Legislative Breakfasts—

Long Awaited Funding Study Completed

In a departure from previous legislative breakfasts, Coalition 2001 is hosting a series of five breakfasts for legislators. These breakfasts bring together legislators and constituents in small groups to have focused discussions about the needs in the MH/DD/SA service system. The breakfasts have been well received and very effective. NAMI North Carolina has been well represented by local constituents. Many thanks to those members who participated in these early morning gatherings.

A short program at the breakfasts reviews the results of a study conducted by Coalition 2001 focusing on the changes that have taken place over the last decade to the MH/DD/SA service system. Among the findings of the study:

̃ Between 1987 and 1998 the number of individuals served through the area programs jumped from 177,000 to approximately 297,000 individuals—a 67% increase. Yet thousands are still waiting for services.

̃ Over the past decade, the Area Programs have absorbed $16 million in direct service allocation cuts. Yet while fewer state dollars have been available, more individuals have been served at the community level.

̃ Due to the large influx of Medicaid dollars, the average per capita state dollar to the Area Program level for Medicaid eligible clients has increased from $282 in 1987 to $936 in 1998. For non-Medicaid clients, however, the per capita state dollars have decreased dramatically during the same time period from $1,034 to $565. Yet there are nearly 2.5 times the number of non-Medicaid clients served by area programs.

Based on the findings of the study, Coalition 2001 is proposing a three-pronged effort to address the erosion of state support to the MH/DD/SA system.

̃ Replacement funding for Area Programs: Return the $16 million in service cuts to the Division of MH/DD/SAS for area programs to provide services for those waiting for services but unable to get them.

Return the $16 million in service cuts to the Division of MH/DD/SAS for area programs to provide services for those waiting for services but unable to get them.

̃ Area Program Equity Restoration: The Area Programs have not had an increase in state funds to offset inflation since 1992. This has resulted in a loss of $27 million in funds to the Area Programs. Coalition 2001 is asking that those lost funds be restored to the Division of MH/DD/SAS for area programs to provide services and to ensure the viability of existing service programs.

The Area Programs have not had an increase in state funds to offset inflation since 1992. This has resulted in a loss of $27 million in funds to the Area Programs. Coalition 2001 is asking that those lost funds be restored to the Division of MH/DD/SAS for area programs to provide services and to ensure the viability of existing service programs.

̃ Area Program Maintenance: This proposal will establish a formula to provide future ongoing increases to community Area Programs to cover annual increases due to inflation.

Coalition 2001 is seeking bill sponsors for its proposals in the House and Senate. You may contact your state representatives and ask them to co-sponsor this important legislation. This proposal will establish a formula to provide future ongoing increases to community Area Programs to cover annual increases due to inflation.

Coalition 2001 is seeking bill sponsors for its proposals in the House and Senate. You may contact your state representatives and ask them to co-sponsor this important legislation.

 

Advocates Meet with Lieutenant Governor Wicker

It’s been a long, long time since a governor or lieutenant governor met with representatives of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse advocates, but that is exactly what happened on February 25.

A group of advocates, including NAMI North Carolina executive director Beth Melcher, met with Lieutenant Governor Wicker to address concerns and needs related to MH/DD/SA services. Lt. Gov. Wicker will be running for the office of Governor in the year 2000.

The group of advocates met with him to urge that addressing the need of persons with mental health, substance abuse, and developmental disabilities be a focus and message of his campaign. The Lt. Gov. was very attentive and interested. He offered the group an opportunity to have additional meetings with his campaign policy staff.

This is a tremendous opportunity to raise our concerns to the highest level of state office and public awareness through an election campaign. We are very appreciative of Lt. Gov. Wicker’s interest in our issues.

Your Opportunity to Vote!

It is time for 1999 NAMI North Carolina affiliate members to vote for members of the Board of Directors and on four proposed bylaws changes. Affiliate members should be receiving their ballot packages in the mail soon.

Nine qualified candidates have consented to run for election to fill seven positions on the Board of Directors.

Please review the material enclosed with your ballot, then vote and return the ballot to the state office. To be counted, the ballot must be received by Wednesday, April 7, 1999.

 

From the President...

Senator John Edwards has moved to Washington. His new office in the Senate building is undergoing renovations, and he has just hired his legislative staff. Last week as I talked with the Raleigh nurse, Laurie Armstrong, who serves as Edwards’ assistant for health affairs, she assured me that Senator Edwards would be a friend of the mentally disabled—NAMI’s friend—because of his background as a lawyer defending the rights of persons disabled by accidents.

Thanks to the annual NAMI Legislative Conference, I had been thoroughly prepped about the current status of our issues before I spent that hour briefing Laurie. These are the same issues that we ask you to contact your Congressional delegation about. Laurie indicated they would like to hear from many of you—and often.

Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999. This bill would permit SSDI beneficiaries to continue to receive Medicaid coverage, even if they earn more than the current limit of $500 a month, nor would employment be used as the basis for scheduling a review to see if they should lose their disability status. In addition, this bill would create a "ticket to work," a voucher that allows SSI and SSDI beneficiaries to choose the employment and rehabilitation provider they prefer. Currently, the only employment provider that is reimbursed by the government is Vocational Rehabilitation, a system built around persons with physical handicaps and geared toward short-term interventions to place individuals with mild disabilities in jobs they are already trained for.

The result is that persons with mental illness have their records closed by Vocational Rehabilitation the first time they are unable to sustain a job. Other venues, such as clubhouses and supportive job services do a better job of coaching and supporting persons with mental illness.

The work incentive bill nearly passed Congress last year. Now it seems to be on the fast track in the Senate, but will need some pushing in the House. Our Congressmen/women should hear from us that 85-90% of persons with SPMI are now unemployed, but 72% of people with disabilities, according to a recent Harris poll, would like to work. However, because of fear of losing their Medicaid or disability benefits before they are self-supporting, only 1% of SSDI beneficiaries leave Medicaid roles to work.

Funding for brain research and the state block grants to cover new PACT (Program for Assertive Community Treatment) teams. In this year of budget surplus, the President’s budget was disappointing in asking for only a 2.4% increase in funding for National Institute of Health research. The problem is that funding for our projects is in competition this year with funding for national defense (for which Clinton proposes the largest increase since the Cold War), since both must come from "discretionary funds."

Opponents of increased research funding argue that NIH got a huge increase of 15% last year and that it cannot effectively absorb another big infusion of funds. Our counter argument is that only 20% of NIH research proposals do get funded; Congress set a goal of doubling the federal biomedical research budget by the year 2005, and we need another infusion of funds to meet that goal. Our own stories can be convincing about the effectiveness of the research that led to the new atypical medications and how much we still need to know about brain disorders.

Funding for block grants to the states for mental health services has been frozen since 1992. In this year of budget surpluses, it is time to melt that ice to create in every state PACT teams, the wrap-around services that have proved so successful in keeping people out of the hospital. (Contact the state office for information about this new NAMI initiative.)

Funding for Supported Housing. One of the most successful programs providing money to build or rehab housing is HUD’s 811, which has taken successive cuts in the last few years. In another hit, public housing providers can now cut residents with mental illness out of federally funded

"elderly only" public housing, where they had been granted a proportion of the units.

In addition to more 811 funding, we need to advocate for a separate allocation for tenant-based rental assistance for non-elderly people with disabilities, who have been affected by this recent change. We also need to be aware that last year’s "Fair Housing Act," which will probably reappear this year, is an attempt to restrict, not enlarge, housing for persons with mental illness. The Act would have required notification of neighborhoods before a supported living facility could be opened, and it would limit "over concentration" of units in certain areas—not recognizing that "affordable" housing can exist only in those "over-built" areas.

A major talking point for our support of federal housing money is the extreme poverty of persons with mental illness. Persons on SSI receive only about 24% of the median income; rent for an efficiency apartment in 1990 would take 69% of that income. The mentally ill population is at the very bottom of poverty level. The problem is the very limited SUPPLY of rental homes or apartments that persons with mental illness can afford. Our local officials and Congressmen may not realize that the problem of homelessness is, in part, the result of a lack of affordable housing.

Many observers think there is a good chance that Congress may work across party lines to achieve some significant legislation this session to repair the image of the partisan impeachment trial.

NAMI legislative leaders urge advocates to contact members of their state’s congressional delegation to urge swift action on managed care patient protection legislation. Rather than advocate for any specific proposal, NAMI members are urged to focus on a few basic elements that must be included in any legislation Congress passes: binding third-party reviews, curb on restrictive formularies, ombudsmen programs for vulnerable consumers, etc. Access to treatment should be stressed as central to all of theses issues. Personal stories are particularly effective in bringing home the message of increasing access to quality care and enhancing accountability in managed care.

Now is the time to get in touch with your Congressmen/women and press these issues. The NAMI legislative staff urges that we advocate for increased appropriations with our Congressmen/women now and through June 30, the budget deadline. With over 400 new member families in NAMI North Carolina in the past six months, we are now better armed to make a difference than ever before.

Write your letter or make your call now—before you forget!

-Shirley Strobel

 

 Family-to-Family "Shatters Years of Silence"

and Opens Door to Healing

Quoted from a consumer describing the tremendous effectiveness of the Family-to-Family Education Program and telling much about his personal growth.

"Eighteen years ago, when I left law school and entered a psychiatric ward for the first of what would be many, many, many times, my parents had no idea of the dynamics of the illness from which I suffered. They felt the need to shield my brothers from what was happening to me, and a silence fell upon my parents and me about my bizarre and incomprehensible behavior. Thus began the enormous isolation that was to plague me for many years. It was bad enough that friends and lovers fell away, but what was really excruciating was that within my own family I was left alone to bear the burden of the strange psychotic world I kept going in and out of."

"My parents stuck by me...their ignorance of the true nature of the illness created enormous tension and stress within the household. Convinced that work would straighten me out, my parents urged me to take jobs...these attempts failed, bringing yet more despair and more guilt....My parents and I became an isolated trio of silence and pain. They had nowhere to turn and neither did I. There was unexpressed anger and pain on both sides."

"I managed to achieve two years of psychiatric stability....About four weeks after they started the [Family-to-Family Education] class, I suffered a decompensation that landed me, once again in the hospital. I shall never forget my mother’s demeanor when she came to visit me. There was a clarity and strength in her presence I had never experienced before. There was a calmness in the face of this crisis that I found strengthening. And she was very clear in her understanding that we had a common enemy in the disease itself. How liberating it was to hear her words, ‘You are not to blame for this...’ The knowledge, insight, and emotional support that my mother gained through the Family-to-Family class had shattered years of silence and denial, opened gates of communication between us, and allowed us to speak openly about this catastrophic illness that had struck our family. Her understanding of serious brain disorders gained through the program has helped me better accept and understand my own illness and permitted me to let go of the shame and guilt that haunted me for so many years....This program has brought healing to me and to my family. I am convinced it is the single most important vehicle for driving the future growth of the family movement..."

For many years families have struggled with the challenge of defining and maintaining a healthy relationship with their loved one. This involves being able to set boundaries and limits that, oftentimes, are painful but helpful to their relative. How do I take care of myself and other family members when crisis strikes? Is there something that I did wrong to cause him/her to turn out this way? These are some of the most silently pondered questions that plague the minds of family members with a loved one diagnosed with serious psychiatric disabilities. These questions and many more can be answered throughout the free 12-week Family-to-Family class.

If you are interested in enrollment or teaching this class, please call Matisha Brown at the state office. The next Teacher Training will be held in Raleigh on April 16th - 18th. Help make a difference; call for your volunteer opportunity today!

-Matisha Brown,

Family-to-Family Coordinator

 

remember: NAMI North Carolina’s Spring Conference

April 9 and 10, 1999

Holiday Inn, Research Triangle Park

 

Hospital Survey Results

During the past legislative session funds were approved to continue the development and design of plans for a new Dorothea Dix Hospital, one of the four state psychiatric hospitals. A study of the hospitals had identified extreme and sometimes dangerous physical plant deficiencies as well as hospital design which interfered with treatment activities. The study recommended building new hospitals. Therefore, it is hoped that the the design for Dorothea Dix hospital will serve as a prototype for the other hospitals.

In response to the effort to redesign Dix Hospital, and ultimately all four state psychiatric hospitals, NAMI North Carolina surveyed its members to identify those design features considered most important for new hospitals. Specifically, we surveyed all members (consumer and family members) within the Dix catchment area. We also sent surveys to all NAMI North Carolina Board members and all affiliate presidents outside of the Dix area asking them to respond through input from their members.

The response was overwhelming. Of the 400 surveys sent, 150 were returned, a 38% response rate. Following are highlights from the results:

Patient Rooms

- Providing a single room was ranked as the most important patient room feature. Having ample natural light (windows, skylights) also was ranked highly.

- Comments reflected a desire to allow room to feel homey and to be personalized, for example a comfortable chair and reading lamps, plants, personal items, and pleasant wall colors.

- The availability of private or semi-private bathrooms was ranked third highest on the list and reflected in a number of comments.

- A number of comments reflected the need for some locked personal space, either a locker or drawer, or some type of secure storage.

Dining

- Offering dining on the same floor where patients reside was ranked most highly by respondents.

- Through comments and "other" rankings respondents also made it clear that individual choice was important. For example they indicated that there should be menu choices, soft drinks and snack supplies on the floor, a kitchen service area on the floor, and an opportunity to choose whether or not to eat with peers.

Visitation

- Having private areas for visitation was ranked most highly followed by ease of access to visitation areas.

- Comments and other responses identified the importance of having visitation in the patient’s room if desired.

- Several responses indicated a desire to have a private area to have meals or special occasions with family members.

Common Areas

- The presence of a central open nursing station was ranked most highly followed by the availability of laundry facilities on the floor.

- Though not ranked at the top, many individuals had comments regarding the availability of smoking and exercise areas. A number of comments urged that these areas appeal to the whole person.

Campus

- Secure outdoor areas were ranked significantly higher than any other feature.

- Comments focused on beautifying the surroundings by providing such things as gardens, sitting areas, and outdoor activity areas.

Therapeutic Services

- Offering individual and group therapy on the unit was ranked most highly.

- Comments made a distinction based on the needs of the patient. Many saw need for patients to be involved in work related skills and for providing step down units to assist in better discharge planning.

Security Measures

- Three features were ranked as having equal importance: an intercom in the room, closed circuit cameras in the halls, and adequate lighting.

- A number of comments reflected the need for adequate and well-trained staff as an important security factor.

Survey results were submitted to the Division of Mental Health. In response, Don Willis, Section Chief, Mental Health Services, wrote, "I want to thank you...for the tremendous effort in soliciting ideas... regarding the design of a new Dix Hospital....We will share the survey results with the design firm to be used during the ‘programming phase’ of the design process....We will also use the survey results as we structure focus groups where family members and consumers will have the opportunity to share their ideas directly with the facility designers."

 

Resources on the Web

Families of children and adolescents with Serious Emotional Disabilities (SED) often tell us that schools are very slow to respond with appropriate services for their children. Now there is a way on the world wide web to report possible special education violations and remain anonymous. This web site was developed by Assistive and Adaptive Computing Techonology in Education with the hope that state and federal governments will use the website to educate themselves about the pervasive nature of these violations.

Go to http://at-advocacy.phillynews.com/data/violations2.html and choose "Feeling Powerless." You will have the option to submit your alleged violation by answering 11 questions. You can also review what other parents and care givers throughout the country have entered.

What follows are various web sites that offer information on mental illness in children and adolescents. You will find a variety of fact sheets, journal articles, the latest research findings and more on these sites. Happy surfing!

· American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: www.aacap.org

· American Academy of Pediatrics: www.aap.org

· American Psychiatric Association: www.psych.org

· Center for Mental Health Services/Knowledge Exchange Network: www.mentalhealth.org

· Central Directory of Resources (Family Support Network): www.med.unc.edu/commedu/familysu/

· Diane Weaver’s Website for Parents: www.a-o.com/d-g-weaver/

· Exceptional Children’s Assistance Center: www.ECAC-parentcenter.org

· Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health: www.ffcmh.org/enghome.htl

· NAMI (National Alliance for the Mentally Ill): www.nami.org

· National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities (NICHCY): www.nichcy.org

· National Institute for Mental Health: www.nimh.nih.gov

· And our own, NAMI North Carolina: www.naminc.org

-Linda Swann,Young Families Program Coordinator

Thanks to Phone-a-thon Volunteers

NAMI North Carolina held its phone-a-thon campaign on February 23 and 24, 1999. Ten dedicated volunteers helped raise $8,590 in pledges to NAMI North Carolina!

Thank you to the following who came out from the Durham affiliate on the first night: Christine McHugh, John Henry and Vera Pfifferling, J. Clinton Rogers and Shirley Strobel.

Also, thank you to those who came out from the Wake County affiliate on the second night: Sid and Linda Dwoskin, Anneliese Evrenidis, Rich Greb and Rock Kershaw.

NAMI North Carolina depends greatly on its generous contributions to fund the many programs that help provide support, education and advocacy for persons experiencing mental illness.

 

Leadership Academy Timely and Important

NAMI North Carolina’s Leadership Academy was held February 26-28 at the Holiday Inn, Research Triangle Park. Twenty-two participants completed the training which was conducted by Jack Stringfellow and Jackie Chellew of NAMI West Virginia. Consumers and family members were trained to be effective advocates and to have an integral role in shaping mental health services. Four participants were trained to be "trainers" and will use this initial training session as a basis for expanding and developing future NAMI North Carolina leadership academies.

Comments from participants included "instructors worked so well with each other and with students...timely and important to both consumers and their families... instructors terrific...thorough and well presented!"

NAMI North Carolina thanks all who participated and made our first Leadership Academy a success.

 

Medications and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a potentially devastating illness, and is included as one of the five major mental illnesses. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder can be present by itself or found along with schizophrenia, bipolar, other anxiety disorders and is very commonly found in persons who are clinically depressed. OCD is usually treated with a combination of specific behavioral therapies and medications. It is important to note that many psychoactive medications are not likely to help OCD symptoms, but that a number of partially effective drugs have now been carefully evaluated. The treatment, however, for most OCD patients should involve the combination of behavior therapy with medications.

The six drugs that have been shown to be effective in double-blind studies include: Clomipramine (Anafranil), fluvoxamine (Luvox), fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), paroxetine (Paxil), and citalopram (Celexa). Anafranil has been around the longest and is the best studied throughout the world. There is growing evidence that the other drugs listed are as effective.

A number of disorders which are related to OCD, in their most severe form, such as compulsive gambling, sexual behaviors, trichotillomania (pulling one’s hair), body dysmorphic disorder, compulsive eating, nail biting, and compulsive spending may also be helped. More research is needed in this area to give firm recommendations.

This information was gathered from the Obsessive Compulsive Foundation web site. The web site address is www.ocfoundation.org or telephone in Connecticut (203)878-5669.

 

 Food Lion Project

NAMI North Carolina would like to thank all of its members, including our affiliate presidents, who have been distributing vouchers for Food Lion Community Way Days on April 26, 27 and 28, 1999.

Look for information concerning the use of the vouchers in April’s Clippings!